Is wpf good. WPF has some features WinUI 3 doesn't (yet) have (eg.

Is wpf good Wpf projects will guide you through the general usage patterns, and the Localization. A problem with dialogs in wpf is the dialogresult = true can only be achieved in code. 5 meaning your users must be using the latest version. It uses the easy to learn yet modern, powerful Delphi language for the program code and to drive the applications. Look on other good looking apps (Photoshop CS4, Adobe Reader 9, OSX Preview, etc etc) they are actually really clean. If you're brand new to WPF, then we recommend that you start from the first chapter and then read your way through all of it. WPF is beautiful in its simplicity and flexibility. A Guided Tour of WPF by Josh Smith. NET. WPF is heavily dependent upon the DirectX and they can't have that on Linux or Mac. web browser. In Microsoft case, a . Default. I am thinking about the design of a WPF or Silverlight application. Net Framework support plugin is what is used at the client side. However it’s way to fragile and complicated and missing so much basic functionality. I have only one view, the MainWindow which consists of a Grid with 1 column and 3 rows (TopBar, center and BottomBar). WPF alone is just crazily user-hostile. public class RequestCloseDialogEventArgs : This is a good approach and I used similar ones in the past. 0 meaning it has greater ease in deployment. I don't know if they have gone WPF though, but they have a good track record. NET WPF a good choice? What would be your recommendations? Blend seems to crash when I try to edit the template of a RichTextBox (even blend 3. Everyone has their own way. The catch here is "desktop" and "windows". the original intent to have it be the premier Windows UI toolkit). How to prevent marshalling errors when accessing UI elements from non-UI threads? 0. emodendroket on Oct 15, 2014 | root | parent | next. i came up with the follwing design : WPF has been around for a few years now and Microsoft's decision to rewrite Visual Studio (2010) in WPF is a good sign that it is here to stay. this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. Anyway I'm still learning but have created some cool stuff with WPF, currently working on my own implementation of 'Sets' which I have the core functionality working (Tabs for any desktop windows) just cleaning it up and trying to In general, WPF is perfoming much worse in drawing performance than Windows Forms, and native GDI or DirectX. But the way data binding is technically done in WPF is somewhat special, as it's tied to classes like: DependencyProperty I was also a bit skeptical about MVVM until I watched this great presentation by Jason Dolinger. However, having all of that stuff dangling in front of you makes you move a little slower and you have to think harder before you start writing WPF code. design is fantastic, yet Microsoft uses Fluent UI for O365 HTML UI. There is still a lot of demand in legacy applications or "edge" cases which require a windows Desktop solution for Which is asinine, especially given the name "Windows Presentation Framework" (and its origins in "WinFX", i. I hate WPF too; The Idea of just binding view models to ui implementation without dealing specifically with design details is good. This is compatible with the latest WPF(. That said, WPF does represent a te WPF (if you do it right) has a decent separation of code and UI built in, making WPF applications much easier to test and to evolve. Hello everyone, So am diving into GUI with C# and i don't know what to choose to build the UI WPF or winForms which one is WPF is also outdated but a good start for MAUI and other frameworks. The WPF project was open sourced by Microsoft and published on GitHub . Printing is not too hard in either. proper support for INotifyDataErrorChanged), but saying it's just net more feature rich than WinUI 3 is misleading, not to mention just incorrect. Now that I see there is WPF that I can use instead of WinForms, I would like to ask you a couple of questions. Don't shy away from WPF explore it. There's a lot of things that WinUI 3 has over WPF (eg. But how do you get from bad to good design? I've split the interface (xaml) and codebehind from the main businesslogic class. Reply reply malthuswaswrong • I would say, no, you're not going about this the right way. Greater flexibility. Welcome to this WPF tutorial, currently consisting of 126 articles, where you'll learn to make your own applications using the WPF UI framework. It was one year before Apple released its iPhone. just because you can doesn't mean you should). I have also included what code I have written already. The MVVM design pattern (popular in WPF) seems to be a good pattern for any UI programming. " It's the finishing part that beginners most often have trouble with. But imo the hot reload and just general ease of development is very very good and stacks up to other alternatives which are only specifically targeting windows. a meesage would appear and notify the user that it happened. So it's a lot By the way, the code of the WPF Gallery app is open source, you can find it in the WPF Samples repository here on GitHub. WPF is very very heavily built with data binding at the core, to enable separation of UI from Model. You should be using data binding and an ItemsControl, and let WPF do all the heavy lifting of figuring out where to put things and what to put in them. Jason started with an application that one would write in a “traditional” way, with button clicks handled by event-handlers in the code-behind that then updated other parts of the UI. . Is there a good overview with differences between the various dialects? If not, could this be something which is a part of the upcoming stackoverflow documentation feature. Everything else that is modern seems to heavily target mobile / web apps, and not proper Desktop This is especially true in a WPF application where multiple windows may be sharing the same instance of a view-model. "Attached Properties" are dependency properties, and as such support dependency property value inheritance. If he wants to do a small project quickly WPF could be fine. Databinding in WPF is not just nifty, it also allows you to implement some pretty good architectural designs. That last class is growing big. Since the choice for WPF is obvious, I figured that I may as well go all the way by using MVVM as my application architecture since it offers blendability, separation concerns and unit testability. The regular one is great, though. Microsoft no longer does active development on WinForms, they are strongly pushing WPF, and for good reason. The question is not whether to use WPF or ASP. Which means that me learning this I don't think is employable. WPF's MVVM architecture allows you to build interactive views very quickly, but debugging issues when various viewmodels and events all change state is a nightmare. "WPF is the most feature rich" I would disagree with this. Then, with the following helpers, you can serialize instances of these objects--or List<T> (or arrays T[], etc. A slider could be used, but for compact forms with little horizontal real-estate, the NumericUpDown is essential. WPF allows you to create applications that look good and perform well. But be aware that the acceptable sins of Windows Forms coding won't produce good results in WPF. However, I stopped watching after he starts using Caliburn Micro. Core and Localization. A good example is to show OpenFileDialog or heck even a MessageBox from the ModelViewer class. Domain. As you’ve seen in this blog post, there are two ways to turn the Windows 11 Theming on: Tutorials on WPF. If you learn that, you can take it with you, no matter what UI toolkit you use in the future. NET framework to . Is WPF MediaElement good for my task. That's what everything MS has done WPF and beyond feels like to me. 5 SP1) which is free and have almost all the features for a general purpose(and even more than that) But there are commercial vendors who have good grid controls(Not really free). If you want to learn MVVM, then starting with a small application is certainly a good idea. A good WPF application follows the same model that a good Winforms application would; keeping as much stuff as possible out of the UI layer. Many . In WPF, I feel self-conscious because my app doesn't look "good" like other apps on Windows. ) I need an alternative that can display bold, highlighted, italic text of different colors etc. dll (Here are the business rules) We don't have encountered any issues yet and I don't expect to see any problems in future. As far as having full-blown showcase GUIs, it's a little light -- it's mostly context-specific screen caps. The theming really bugs me. I was concerned for good reasons: I’ve suffered from the collateral damages of the Silverlight failure, and as the proverb says “once bitten, twice shy”. Yes, WPF is powerful in the sense you might make some neat stuff that is not supported in GDI, but it is more sluggish. In contrast, the folk wisdom says, WinForms is simpler and friendlier to beginners and small/one-off projects. Edited : And to answer your question, having good desktop skills in the world of all things web will be I'm just starting up a new, big project that will be using WPF for the front end. I want to react to several HW failures that can happen. React is the biggest of those 3 at this point, but any web technologies are worth learning and will increase your employability later. And XAML is a revolutionary step in software design, imho. I can tell you the code looks cleaner but some menial tasks have become a big trouble for me. Since 2009 I have put a These good things are wrapped up with the good things from traditional Windows development—things like strong integration with the OS and data binding. I used an XmlDataProvider in this example because it's the easiest way to demonstrate how data It was the limit for WinForms, it was the time I knew I must learn WPF. You're doing too much of the work and letting WPF do too little. NET, so you can build applications that incorporate other elements of the . There is less code and easier to make significant changes to your UI using XAML. exe (Contains all the WPF stuff, thin assembly) Sample. Wpf must target 3. Remember, this is one of the most popular IDEs on the market and a sign of intent from the guys at Microsoft. Haven't found anything much better though. The typical WPF projects starts with a main window, put some code in it, add some controls, add more code and next thing the majority of the application code is distributed among the UI layer. Like I said, WPF as a whole has a lot of features, but most are not basic features. I'm trying to get to grips with the different ways of styling/binding data in my WPF application. To best understand this I would like suggestions/help on how I can style my specific example. To achieve that in WinForms, it is a lot more work. I've tried splitting it up into smaller classes, but I'm stuck now. But here's the thing - WPF without MVVM is just ridiculously hard to use. Just to correct you Microsoft is not making WPF Cross-Platform any time soon. There are no new WPF features, and I imagine these fixes are largely driven by VS2022, which is still based on . Lately I have successfully implemented a desktop application using WPF technology with MVVM achtitecture and Prism. I am very I am already sold on that one, but how about the Prism, would you consider that a good choice when it comes to implementing the MVVM pattern? I am quite happy with the product, but I was wondering what is WPF is a huge leap beyond WinForms, in that regard. Presentation. WPF seems like the only one that is mature, has lots of docs, and good 3rd party components. I am developing a MVVM WPF application. If you are having much drawing to do, and you want to support it on slow hardware, then WPF is not a good choice. WPF is a good technology to learn. ) of them--to String. NET Core versions), but the main question you should ask yourself is the following : "What is the client app Framework I will be confortable working with ?" The well-accepted opinion about WPF is that it is complicated and complex, unfriendly to novice users, and with steep learning curve. NET API. I know how to use the RelayCommand but I cannot make OpenFileDialog show. But you should still use a view model anyway, because that's more in keeping with the standard WPF paradigm and the expectations of the WPF API (i. Default slot i am new to WPF and i have one question(the first one actually, more to come) Is it better to add some logic, for example the bindings for the window, in xaml or in the code behind. As Silverlight is somewhat less complex it is actually a very good starting point to get some XAML experience if you don't mind writing a sandboxed browser application instead of a desktop application. Applications. You write a bit more XAML to tell the UI, "If you have to display a Customer property use that user control". Since 2009 I have put a huge personal and I have an MDI WPF app that I need to add web content to. Eranda Eranda. XAML is an XML-based language for describing user interface components such as text boxes, combo I have thus supplemented my reading with some very good playlists on YouTube that show a WPF app being developed from start to finish. This example is the source of my confusion (emphasis mine), which states:. For example: an event fired that changed a view and tried to set a default tab, but the data has not finished loading asynchronously from a web service so the tab doesn't exist (yet) so nothing happens In Windows Forms, you can get away with that sort of thing. Store each of these various strings in its own respective Settings. They are all over. The "WPF Application" template in Visual Studio does all of that for you I'm reading a lot about good and bad practices in OOP design. Really, unless it specifically needs to be desktop you’re better off with a web-app. So if they attach an event to a model that may out-last them then the view-model will be leaked. But this isn't clear my doubt. I think most people will know what this means. In my opinion, C++/CLI is truly great, but it requires to know C++ and dotnet and the dotnet interaction with the native code. The screenshot below demonstrates the look I am aiming for. I chose WPF because it's future-proof and offer lots of flexibility. There is even a public roadmap for WPF with target dates for 2022. Good practice or bad practice. This usually leads to code that is hard to maintain and impossible to test automatically. I am planning to use MVC (or another such design pattern) Witch ever of the design patterns I choose, I need to connect to view to the model (or presenter) – is databinding a good way of doing this? You still have not said why it's more difficult, what is a good example of what is easy in Winforms compared to WPF, can you give an example?. Complete customization of WPF window can be done only when AllowsTransparency is set to "True", which causes that the From the above which one you people will suggest?. TLDR: We review the status of Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) in 2024 and beyond, whether it’s usage is increasing or declining and if this is a good platform to develop on for the long WPF is a Windows-only desktop application framework that uses a vector-based architecture meaning the applications can scale from small to big screens and still provide a WPF is best windows desktop UI framework. WPF is much heavier on resources than Windows Forms, and if you don't architect your application to be lean, you end up with a 800-pound gorilla. It's probably a good reason some people still stick to WinForms. But I really tried to use it anyway. What I want to know is if you, as a developer like me, tried Expression Blend and found that it was a waste of time or you thought it was a good tool and you stopped developing the WPF GUIs from VS and switched to EB. However, there is C++/CLI, which allows you to take any C++ code (MFC included) and give it dotnet interface. – RobertBaron. By learning WPF, you'd be learning UI and app programming-model concepts more closely aligned to other modern-era UI frameworks. NET framework 3. As a WPF developer for years I was recently concerned by the new direction chosen by Microsoft on its client platforms with the rise of the brand new WinRT framework. NET Framework versions later, it got improved, and it’s still there. OP wrote: I wanted to start my first game small So What is the best alternative for WPF? It’s the VCL. I have read that setting AllowsTransparency = true would force WPF to render in software-mode. I'm still working in WPF over UWP just because afaik UWP has to be 'deployed' and won't just build to an executable (unless that has changed?). I'm looking for some kind of solution for an integrated help system. Good luck ! Share. Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) has been released as part of the . This is a good suggestion, but I think the lack of editors and general support for FlowDocument is going to be a problem. I'm interested in their relative productivity, which you speak to in your last two paragraphs. The goal of those articles is to bring someone with no WPF experience up-to-speed enough so that (s)he can fully understand how the series’ demo application works. you can do it the other way, but you'll be fighting the intent of the designers of the WPF API, which will lead to more frustration and difficulty). At first, great it looks like I have 2 options built into the framework the Frame control and the WebBrowser control. As a side note, xbap plugins and similar risky approaches are not Not mine, but too good not to quote: "The best game engine is one you finish your game in. Jason Dolinger made a good screencast of MVVM. WPF is definitelynot dead. Also, when they try to submit and it fails, because some mandatory field was not filled in correctly, then you let the user know which field they need to change (by using those red borders, for instance). Follow answered Jun 19, 2014 at 5:20. Like I am googling around trying to find WPF applications that look good and I don't see it. WPF is part of . That’s why, almost everyone suggest that it is not suitable for beginners or for one-off projects. The first one is Tim Corey. Making a WPF application is just like any other application, except that you need to start the message pump, create the application, setup your startup window, etc. Bea Stollnitz (link is to her archives) has a number of While most of the guidelines apply to LOB (Line of Business) applications, you'll find some good information there about what not to do w/WPF (i. You can store your settings info as Strings of XML in the Settings. WIth the new Windows 11 Fluent Theme styles for WPF, you can build modern looking applications for Windows. I would suggest WPF Toolkit which can be downloaded from DatGrid available in Codeplex. NET 2. WPF is Windows Presentation Foundation that creates the UI for Windows desktop applications (normally). Thank-you! As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. It is a neat way to get users to select a number from a fixed range, in a small area. The well-accepted opinion about WPF is that it is complicated and complex, unfriendly to novice users, and with steep learning curve. The MVVM pattern was already mentioned in one of the comments, And in that light, WPF seems to be a good fit. I used to be making good money with WPF and would have called myself expert back in the days. 1. NET core doesn't make it cross-platform. Then, WPF just dynamically generates that UserControl when something has to "present" a customer. e. Share. Unlike views which have an unloaded event, view-models don’t have a good story for life-cycle management. It's simple, yet effective. My WPF application is quite simple. I recommend all my co-workers who are starting out in WPF and MVVM to watch it. WinForms can target . But, as you know, performance isn't just about how fast your app can go—it's also about how smooth it feels. Is there any good framework available which is more flexible when compare to this?. Micro-2. I referred this link. Aquí nos gustaría mostrarte una descripción, pero el sitio web que estás mirando no lo permite. 0 in 2006. Ask Question Asked 9 Provide a language selector in WPF application for switching between supported languages; Markdown files in Localization. The WPF WebBrowser control wraps up the IE WebBrowser ActiveX Control which uses the Win32 Animations and visuals are easier / better in WPF; Both have support for database connectivitiy (. Is there anyth This will automatically give you an application, Window class, and everything else you need to get started. Well, regarding WinForms/WPF: to be honest my „ui design work“ to this day was basically dragging controls from the toolbox to my form and implementing logic behind it. I've used both (WinForms more heavily than WPF/Silverlight) and the most difficult transitions for me were: Just put a * in front on the mandatory fields. Career wise is learning WPF a career killer? Because I don't imagine anyone would want to actually use a crappy looking WPF application. But my last gig which involved WPF was four years ago. At that stage will it easy to convert from one framework to another or we have to do the same thing from the scratch? When I have developed using WPF, I have found answers to all of my questions, and newer versions of the WPF framework seem to address problems I have run into. I have been looking at making my own window frame in WPF, similar to Visual Studio. Laurent C# is good for GUIs, but MFC dlls do not interface with anything else, not all by themselves. We are going to use WPF. You can skip knowing styles, data binding, data templates, control templates, validation etc. Demo application will serve you as a sample localizable WPF project. In WPF, these concepts are strengthened and unified. Most are good MVVM examples, but not when you get into complex issues. The VCL is also available for C++ programmers and there is also Sample. Hell you even skip XAML initially, muck around in the I have a multi threaded wpf application with various HW interfaces. dll (Is responsible to the application's workflow, here are all ViewModels) Sample. Nowadays, desktop applications are becomming extremely rare and most users prefer web or WPF, short for Windows Presentation Foundation, is a graphical user interface framework that Microsoft developed to build rich and interactive Windows desktop WPF makes more sense if you are using good application architecture patterns and presents a better way to control the look and feel of your application. 868 1 1 gold WPF - How to bind to a color in resources with Caliburn. Like Egor mentioned there is no one good example. BTW, FAST. About basic dependency properties, a very rough statement would be that they basically inherit their values from parent elements in the wpf (logical/visual) tree. It's nice that it is heavily themeable, but its default Oh, well, that’s good to hear. For example : one of the interfaces is a temperature sensor and i want that from a certain temp. NET coder and a good WPF coder. I personnaly see MVVM not as a benefit, but as an obligation for those who want to use WPF cool features. WPF is a UI framework, not an app framework. The WPF Browser App is similar to Java applets which uses a browser plugin to run the applet. Improve this answer. I like his presentation and I found him easy to follow. WPF is still good (or it wouldn't be shipped with latest . I had several small projects going from highly structured to Spaghetti in a day of work lmao. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, I am very new to WPF and I am interested in learning it. Ask Question Asked 14 years, 9 months ago. Even all that does not capture the full extent of WPF. I want to develop my wpf project by using MVVM pattern. I am also a fan of DevExpress, and their support is great, but the wpf grid is still in beta. i. Given that this is an MDI app it doesn't take long to discover that neither of these will work. It provides the ability to provide a much richer User Experience with less work. That's why I created an interface for my dialogviewmodel to implement it. I know WPF MediaElement has lots of bugs, but my project is quite simple: I have two big video files, 500 mb each - same visuals, with different rendered texts - for 2 different languages. Its databinding facilities are spectacular compared to the hacked-together windows forms binding models. It's nice to know your design is bad, or good. This article will give you a good introduction to what WPF is all about without diving too deep. WPF has some features WinUI 3 doesn't (yet) have (eg. Gives designers a lot of flexibility in theory. (Right now i am concentrating on WPF projects and later i will move to Silverlight). The community is fairly light, but many packages developed for WPF, UWP have added WinUI support and vendors are regularly releasing more controls. A control that is missing from the original set of WPF controls, but much used, is the NumericUpDown control. Being restricted by the engine may actually help OP to avoid scope creep. As you have probably figured out by now WPF is not Silverlight. NET3. WPF allows for much easier "resolution agnostic" designing. Summary. If you really want to use some wpf-powers an easy trick is opacity transitions, just keep all animations Razor is good for simple websites, but for highly interactive apps (like WPF is good at) you're looking at Web Single-Page-Application frameworks like React, Vue, or Angular. I guess I didn't make it clear, that programmer ability is a constant -- a good ASP. Rather Silverlight is a "light" version of WPF in the browser. NET underpins wpf and Winforms). Introduction. NET 4. WPF provides a comprehensive set of application-development features that include Extensible Application Markup Language (XAML), controls, data binding, layout, 2D and 3D graphics, animation, styles, templates, documents, media, text, and typography. That's where async programming comes in. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, EDIT: I know what Microsoft says about the tools. I have pretty limited experience with desktop stuff (mostly Winforms) but with the SPA frameworks now it's about as expressive and deployment issues go away (which is nice in a small shop where you can't just foist them on someone else). Should I create new folder to separate Model, View, ViewModel or create new project for each? Which one is good practice? I downloaded sample project, some of project have separate folder for it and some of have separate project for each. That’s why, almost everyone suggest that it is not As the great writer Mark Twain said in a letter to The New York Journal “the report of my death was an exaggeration” . Thanks for the answer, NerdFury. Migrating WPF from . I have never found a good free grid. Is it considered "good practise" to have a private event that will only be subscribed to from within the Object itself? (a WPF-Window)? The alternative would be to just call a Method similar to the EventHandler delegate wherever I invoke the event. Create some classes to store your configuration data and make sure they are [Serializable]. 8. Using the templating features of WPF, you can write a bit of XAML like a user control with text boxes for the first/last name, address, etc. VCL – an abbreviation of Visual Component Library – is a set of visual tools effective for the rapid development of Windows applications. For an account software, which I would like to have it looking good, with dynamic graphs and "easy on eyes" with light animations (like apps on iphone, transitions etc), is C# . There's not a Windows look and feel anymore. It’s All about the XAML. Both of them are pay, though, but worth it. lots of built-in controls with modern styles, built-in support for multiple input I've read and heard from several people that WPF has a pretty steep learning curve (depending on how knowledgeable or experienced you are). But it's still something ubiquitously preinstalled on all current Windows OS's so also unlikely to truly go away in our lifetimes. I'd second Telerik, which is what MS used for office, IIRC. The model for working with WPF is definitely different than WinForms. There are two concepts here: dependency properties and attached dependency properties. The core logic of the application and the data layer should be the same, but there are now easier ways of making the visuals more impressive, which is likely why most of the information you've seen on it involves the flashier Introduction. In 2019, WPF is in its 13th year which raises the question if WPF is still a good choice? What is WPF? One problem is, that all too often I end up with a solution for WPF or Silverlight or Windows Phone which is not applicable to an UWP app. I didn't care what my WinForms apps looked like, I just focused on getting things done. I wrote a series of introductory WPF articles on The Code Project. vck wwllq xqv gihmizn qcpd ovbrxyco swlf lfdcf tktpbf bfya iurfx lxr nvf ohyf tquojst